(18 May 2026) arXiv has warned that authors who submit work containing clear evidence of unchecked large language model (LLM) output could face a one-year submission ban.
The comments were made by Thomas Dietterich, current chair of the Computer Science Section of arXiv, in a series of posts on X – where he outlined the platform’s expectations around author responsibility and the consequences for failing to verify AI-generated material.
According to Dietterich, arXiv has now clarified its penalties where submissions contain “incontrovertible evidence” that authors failed to check LLM-generated output. “If a submission contains incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation, this means we can’t trust anything in the paper,” he said.
The stated penalty is “a one-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue.”
Read more here.
